project screenshot

The Climbing Beta

The Climbing Beta is a crowd-sourced review forum site where users can search for indoor gyms, outdoor climbing routes, and reviews and ratings to be shared with the community.

Project Overview

Background

This was the capstone project for my UI/UX Bloc apprenticeship design program, we were given the creative freedom to tackle any problem we wanted to so I wanted to work on something that meant a lot to me. In order to increase the accessibility of rock climbing resources among the climbing community, I created The Climbing Beta.

  • Roles
  • UX Research, Content Strategy, UI Design, User Testing

  • Deliverables
  • User surveys, Competitive analysis, User personas, User stories, User flows, Wireframes, High-fidelity mockups, Clickable prototypes

  • Tools
  • Adobe Photoshop, Figma, InVision, UsabilityHub, GitHub, Google Forms

  • Timeframe
  • 4 weeks

Problem

Climbing is largely considered to be a friendly and social sport with great communities, but a problem I've noticed is that people are having a hard time finding popular climbing routes and gyms while visiting new or unfamiliar areas.

Why is there no easy way to share knowledge about great outdoor climbs or indoor gyms?

Having experienced this problem myself and being an avid and passionate member of the rock climbing community, I decided this was a problem that I wanted to use my design skills to tackle.


Solution

Enter The Climbing Beta. The Climbing Beta gives users a solution for searching for climbing routes and gyms in areas they might not be familiar with.

Because the reviews and information given are 100% crowd-sourced, users get the benefit of utilizing different local communities for honest and reliable reviews.

project screenshot
Discovery

Preliminary Research

In order to gauge how people in the climbing community were accessing information, I conducted some quick informal interviews during multiple sessions at the local climbing gym.

I asked climbers:

1) where they went to get recommendations for good climbs while traveling to unfamiliar areas

2) how much they trusted the information they gathered

What I learned was that:

  • most climbers primarily rely on word-of-mouth recommendations and physical guide books when looking for new climbing routes

  • others use sites like Google search reviews, Yelp, and Facebook as supplemental resources

  • the most trustworthy recommendations were from friends or fellow climbers

  • second to that were sites like Mountain Project (hosted by REI) and reddit but many climbers stated not liking the clutteredness of the UI

Comparing the most popular review forums

Based on the responses gathered from the informal interviews, I conducted a competitive analysis between the most popular methods of searching for new climbing routes that users reported using: Yelp, Facebook, and Google search.

yelp comparison facebook comparison google reviews comparison
Key Takeaways

Yelp is good for the sheer quantity of reviews and ratings but their sponsored content, ads, and cluttered interface take away from the user experience.

Facebook is a good resource for recommendations because you can receive information from trusted individuals within your social circle. This is also one of its major limitations, sometimes recommendations are limited by the size and diversity of your social circle and timing of a post can affect the amount of people who view it.

Google search and reviews is great in that it can utilize the power of the search engine and automatically provides location data based on your search results.

Secondary research

Building on the insights gained from the informal interviews and the competitive analysis, I decided to conduct a more structured online user survey in order to further gauge users' behaviors on these review sites. I chose this method because it was the fastest way to gain a lot of qualititative and quantitative data in a short period of time.

Key survey insights:

The results are based on the responses of 21 participants, of which the top occupations consisted of teachers, software developers, and students. Of these, 51.7% are female and 42.9% are between the ages of 25-29.

Key survey takeaways:

What is your favorite feature about these review sites?

"Ease of accessibility"

"Helps narrow down options"

"Provides insights you wouldn't otherwise find"

What are some frustrations you experience while using these review sites?

Some reviews are fake / ratings are abused

64.7%

Interface seems cluttered

11.8%

Site doesn't seem credible

11.8%

If there is an option to leave a rating and/or review on a site which do you tend to complete more?

Rating

81%

Review

4.8%

Both

14.3%

How much does a review's credibility increase in value if there is no option for anonymity?

A fair amount

38.1%

A little

38.1%

A lot

23.8%

What are some improvements you would like to see for review sites?

"Easy to use and ability to sort/filter search results"

"Verified reviews, ability to report fake reviews"

"No ads or sponsored content"

Creating the user personas

Using the data gathered from the demographics of the user survey and building on all the previous research, we created 3 types of potential personas: The Local, The Traveler, and The Googler.

These three personas, the Local, the Traveler, and the Googler, represent the most important user pain points and needs that we discovered in previous steps. A summary of the Local and the Traveler are shown below.

project screenshot project screenshot

Madeline

Type: The Local

Age: 23

Occupation: Grad Student

Location: Austin, TX

"I don't take advice from a gray avatar."

Bio

As a seasoned climber and internet sketpic, Maddy's weary of online reviews.

She usually relies on word of mouth suggestions when looking for new routes, gyms, or other local recommendations.

Needs

  • Verification of a places reputation from people she knows
  • Ability to report false reviews

Pain Points

  • Reviews not being detailed enough
  • Having to question the authenticity of a review

Jeevan

Type: The Traveler

Age: 34

Occupation: Software Engineer

Location: Seattle, WA

"I'll try most things at least once!"

Bio

Jeevan loves to travel when he isn't busy fixing coding issues.

Being a fairly curious person, he welcomes the opportunity to experience new things and places.

Needs

  • Easily accessibly map integration feature for directions
  • Ability to sort through reviews based on filters or tags

Pain Points

  • Frustrated with reviews sites that offer search filters
  • Doesn't like not being able to see a user's history to gauge the authenticity of a review

Information Architecture

Narrowing the scope of the project to address the vital user stories

Even though there were plenty of user pain points and needs that I uncovered, I applied the 80/20 rule (or the Pareto Principle which states that about 80% of the results comes from 20% of the causes) to help prioritize the top 6 user stories.

Top 6 user stories:
As a user I want to...
Once I determined those, I created the different user flows for each user story
project screenshot

Leave a review and create an account flow

project screenshot

Search for reviews using filters

project screenshot

Create an event and invite contacts flows

Drawing out the site map

Since this was my first website project, I decided to take the information from my user flows to create a site map to further define the most important pages that needed to be created for the project.

project screenshot

Site map of review site

Sketching wires

Now that I had defined what the structure of the site would look like, I started off my wireframing process by sketching out the 3 most important pages that would bear the brunt of my user stories and flows.

project screenshot project screenshot

Dashboard, create event, and create message screen initial sketches

Moving from paper to digital

Next, I built out my paper sketches in Figma. I chose to use this program because of its amazing collaborative and prototyping features.

project screenshot

User testing with senior design team members

In order to test my assumptions about content placement and information hierarchy, I decided to submit my first round of user testing to a Daily Design Critique session with a senior design team member and fellow designers in training at Bloc.

Some valuable feedback that I received was:

Home page
Changes made:
Search results page
Changes made:
Climbing page
Changes made:
Visual Design

Defining the brand identity

The Climbing Beta's main purpose is to help users find potential climbing routes and gyms through crowd-sourced reviews.

I started the branding process by thinking about the physical act of climbing and breaking it down into its simplest form - hands, rock, and chalk (sometimes).

Logo exploration

I began brainstorming for the logo by drawing word maps and then choosing some of those words and finding symbols and graphics that represented them. Through peer feedback and senior logo designer input, I was able to combine a lot of elements from all four logo drafts to create the final logo.

project screenshot
project screenshot

Branding guidelines

Colorography

While brainstorming for Primary colors, I came across this description "Blue is strongly associated with feelings of trust, dependability, and calmness" which are all things I want the site to inspire in it’s design to the users. I decided to go with a mixture of a monotone and triad color scheme - incorporating cool grays and blacks as secondary colors for support.

Typography

Primary font - Oswald is a sans serif font whose design is heavily influenced by ‘Alternate Gothic’ which is described as “Robust, dark, and coolly competent, Alternate Gothic is a good choice when strong typographic statements must fit into tight spaces".

Secondary font - Roboto Condensed is a versatile san-serif font that pairs well with Oswald. Most descriptions on the site will be in paragraph form and this font feels the most similar to text you would find in a travel guide - which pairs well with the feelings and theme for this website.

project screenshot
High-fidelity prototype: user testing and iterations

User task testing round 2

After applying the branding guidelines to the wireframes, I created the first version of my high fidelity prototype. Some things to keep in mind while I was testing were the key pain points: an easy-to-use interface, filters for search results, and accessible information.

General feedback for the first prototype was that the site was easy to navigate and generally pleasant to look at, some points to address for each user task were:

User task - searching for a gym near Austin, TX:


Changes made:
User task - searching for a gym near Austin, TX (cont):


Changes made:
User task - leave a review for Austin Bouldering Project:


Changes made:

Reflections and moving forward

I had a lot of fun working on this project because of my personal affinity for rock climbing. The Climbing Beta was a nice exercise in creating a website concept that solved the problem of information access and allowed users to share information and rate places or climbs for the rock climbing community.

Given more time I would add a terminology page or index - something to help the more novice users of the site understand the climbing jargon better.

All in all, I had a lot of fun designing a tool for an activity that I am passionate about. I learned that most of the time less is better, don’t stack box shadows - if there is one level of elevation then that should be enough, and that there is way more real estate on desktop than mobile so you have to be very intentional and strategic with what you place and where.

Back to top